It appears that on 1.5 I can work around the issue by going to 4269 instead of 4326. Since they are functionally the same SRS, you could try that?
P On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Andy Harrison <[email protected]> wrote: > Paul Ramsey wrote: >> >> This appears to be an open issue on 1.5 as well, I have ticketed it. >> >> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/318 >> >> P > > ok thanks, if it's a known issue I'll just try to do the conversion at > application level. > > andy > > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
