Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
Hi Peter,
You've brought up some interesting points here. Can you actually clarify
these changes with regard to parts of the official shapefile spec, or
have they been found purely through experimentation?
Mark,
I would note that the shapefile specification is essentially silent on
the details of the .dbf file, apparently under the assumption that this is
a well known format from other sources and does not need to be specified.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, [email protected]
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
