On Mar 26, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Andrea Peri wrote:
Hi,
thx for response.
I read the postgis documentation and try your link,
in effect the GML 3.1.1 support the topocurve,
but the GML3.1.1 SimpleFeature not support the topocurve.
But reading the postgis documention I read also the support to the
GML 3.2.1, not specifically simple-feature only (perhaps a lack of
documentation?
Well OGC only provide Simple Feature for 3.1.1,
not seen (right now) SF for 3.2.1
And PostGIS support 3.2.1 namespace (as it change from previsous
version)
But not provide more geometry type as 3.1.1 SF-2 (even in 3.2.1 so)
If you have suggestion to improve documentation,
you're welcome :)
--
Olivier
Teh GML3.2.1 supported is a specifically subset simple-feature only ?
Thx,
Andrea.
A good tool to explore schemas online:
<http://schemas.liquid-technologies.com/LibraryDocs/OpenGis/gml/
3.1.1/>
>Well it's true we did'nt document the whole tags list,
>but, from the 1.5 PostGIS documentation:
>"GML 3.1.1 Simple Features profile SF-2 (with GML 3.1.0 and 3.0.0
>backward compatibility)"
>
>So GML 3.1.1 is supported up to Simple Profile level 2. (GML SF-2)
>And TopoCurve is not inside SF-2, but should be part of topology
>profile.
>
>Then it explains why your fragment is not currently supported.
>
>
>A good tool to explore schemas online:
><http://schemas.liquid-technologies.com/LibraryDocs/OpenGis/gml/3.1.1/
>
--
-----------------
Andrea Peri
. . . . . . . . .
qwerty àèìòù
-----------------
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
--
Olivier Courtin
Oslandia
Directeur associé
+33 977 217 501
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
