On 12/05/11 09:35, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Like I said - we want the underlying fix, but I do beleive we want the
fix in PostGIS *as well*.
We surely want the fix in ST_Translate, or whatever _produced_ the inf
coordinate.
Not sure we want to refuse to accept inf coordinates though,
as long as ST_IsValid can catch them, but most importantly
as long as you can have them in your backups...
Yes - the issue was that we were trying to get out of Frank what the
correct behaviour should be to engineer a better fix. See
http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-users/2011-March/029125.html
for the relevant thread.
If you could follow this up on the PROJ.4 list, that would be greatly
appreciated.
ATB,
Mark.
--
Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect
PostgreSQL - PostGIS
Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
http://www.siriusit.co.uk
t: +44 870 608 0063
Sirius Labs: http://www.siriusit.co.uk/labs
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
