postgis-users-boun...@postgis.refractions.net wrote on 06/15/2011 07:49:15 
PM:

> I totally agree but a wrapper would be convenient for people not 
> familiar with intersection operations on raster. Most are familiar 
> with vector/vector intersections on but not with raster/raster ones.

I'm not against wrappers, particularly if the documentation makes it clear 
what the wrapper is wrapping. Wrappers+documentation can be used as a 
learning tool to show how the raster/raster operations are really the same 
thing as the corresponding vector/vector operation.

BTW: I posted this to the devel list, but anyone on the users list 
interested is also welcome to review and criticize my "philosophy" on 
homogeneous vector/raster operations. This is mostly for my own benefit to 
try and wrap my head around the big picture by teasing out the fundamental 
issues.

https://collab.firelab.org/software/projects/modisfire/wiki/Spatial_Set_Operations_in_PostGIS_Raster

Bryce
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

Reply via email to