No worries - is that just adding a ticket in trac, or is there something more sophisticated for documentation?
cheers Ben On 19/12/2011, at 11:58 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:02:49PM +0800, Ben Madin wrote: > >> Either way is fine, but maybe for now we could put a line into the >> documentation to that effect: >> >> "Note: By design only the first invalidity in a polygon is reported. After >> correcting errors identified by st_isvalidreason it should be run again to >> check that there are no further errors." > > Sure, do you feel like producing a patch and attaching it to a ticket on > http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis ? > > --strk; > > ,------o-. > | __/ | Thank you for PostGIS-2.0 Topology ! > | / 2.0 | http://www.pledgebank.com/postgistopology > `-o------' > > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list [email protected] http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
