On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> wrote: > I suspect others are perhaps more likely to get round to it than I am! (My > next P2 priority is finishing the conflict resolution stuff...)
You were right :) I have done the splitting, following the rules you suggested. It's not perfect, but considering the split has no direct external impact, it's good enough I think. In the end, everything ended up in one subfile or other: amenities.xml barriers.xml buildings.xml landuse.xml paths.xml places.xml power.xml roads.xml shopping.xml tourism.xml transport.xml water.xml I generally followed the existing comment divisions, although I grouped a few things like accommodation and entertainment under tourism. The only feature left in map_features.xml itself is multipolygon. I tried to avoid changing any actual features at the time, but couldn't help merging two different definitions of leisure=track. Steve _______________________________________________ Potlatch-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
