On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 12:54 -0400, Alfonso Espitia wrote: > I'm not familiar enough w/ the code, but why is it that it only affects > people that aren't using session tracking? I currently use the IP based > session tracking. > > How can you find out what you current connection limit is with one's > particular installation of pound? Is there any good benchmarking > software that anyone could recommend? > > I haven't run into this problem (yet), but I'd rather avoid if it I can.
Actually this would affect only people who do NOT use session tracking. For those who do the back-end would be fixed after the first request. The scenario Albert was alluding to is one where you have several possible back-ends, with no session tracking: in this case it may happen that the back-end supports HTTP/1.1 (thus allowing connection reuse), but Pound chooses at random another back-end. The problem with sticking with the connection is that the load balancing is less than optimal, at least in the short term. I suspect over longer periods this would even out - YMMV. -- Robert Segall Apsis GmbH Postfach, Uetikon am See, CH-8707 Tel: +41-44-920 4904 -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions.
