> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Segall [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:39 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Pound Mailing List] Summary
>
> Hallo everybody
>
> I was away for a while, so I'd like to answer some of the
> pending posts
> here.

Welcome back!

> - failed connections to back-ends and kill_be (Joe Gooch):
> connecting to
> a back-end is the cheapest check, certainly cheaper than
> reading a page
> and checking on its status. I fully agree that killing a
> back-end should
> be logged - we'll add that to the next release.

Agreed.  Though I think the suggestion of checking a page for status *only when 
deciding whether to resurrect or not* does have merit.  When backends are 
loaded down, frequently they'll be erratic before they're stable again.  (At 
least in my experience)

http://users.k12system.com/mrwizard/pound/pound24.html has a LogBackendDeath 
patch if interested.

> - autoconf dependencies (Thilo Bangert): we'll add -without-pcre,
> --without-hoard, --without-tcmalloc in the next version.
>
> - case-insensitive URL matching: quite frankly, given that
> you can do in
> the regular expression itself, I don't see the benefit of adding a
> configuration flag for that.

(Since these go together)

I wasn't aware of (?i) at all until it was posted here.  It could be added to 
the man page (if it's not there already) since this seems to be a common thing.

I'm still running Pound 1.9 in places... (yeah. Old)  But the point is I 
believe up through 2.2, pound was case insensitive with url matching.  So at 
the least, this is a paradigm shift.

In addition, if compiled --without-pcre, would this (?i) option still be 
available?  Or is it PCRE only?

Seems like it might be worth having a consistent option, regardless of your 
library dependencies.

http://users.k12system.com/mrwizard/pound/pound24.html has "NoCase" versions of 
URL and CheckURL directives that provide an alternate solution to a compile 
time option, with minimal code impact.



For that matter, the more of those patches that go main-stream, the fewer I 
have to maintain. :)

Thanks for your insight!

Joe
--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected].
Please contact [email protected] for questions.

Reply via email to