Hello, now I'm answering myself.
Heiko Schlittermann <[email protected]> (Do 09 Jul 2009 22:00:19 CEST): > Hello, > > here is the conversation with Robert I had so far about using > pound as an HTTPS / HTTPS proxy. He asked me for the reason(s) wanting > this MITM approach. ... > and probably Apaches mod_proxy could be used. Both solutions are not > checked yet, since I like the lean approach of Pound, compared with > these two "fat" applications. > > (The current setup we're testing uses an stunnel connection to the > backend...) Just for the records: client -- { internet } --- [ pound | stunnel ] ------- [ backend ] https://<domain>/path https://<domain>/path works for me. But I'd like to see the stunnel integrated in pound (for admin purposes). Heiko -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE ----------------------------------------- gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B --------------- gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B - -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected]. Please contact [email protected] for questions.
