>From looking at the code... PARM support treats the session key as anything between the ; and the ? (or end of line)
Which means the ID directive isn't used for PARM, it'll take the whole value. If you use poundctl to list sessions, do you see sessions established after a few clients have tried to connect? You mention no one can connect... do you mean the sessions don't stick, or it actually won't connect at all? PARM would only affect session affinity. What version of pound are you using? Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Ingo Siebert [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 5:20 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Pound Mailing List] Session-based load-balancing with PARM > > Hi, > > I'm using POUND a few weeks know for a session-based load balancing > with > Cookies. > This works very well. > > Last week I tried to reconfigure POUND to use an URL parameter > ...(domain.com/app;jsessonid3?...). > The man page says that this is supported by the PARM value. That's why > I > modified the POUND configuration it to > > Session > Type PARM > ID "jsessionid" > TTL 14400 > END > > But after a pount restart, no client was able to create a connection > anymore. > > Is the PARM feature tested in POUND? > Is someone using the PARM load balancing here? > Any idea what was wrong? > > If I change PARM back to COOKIE, all works very well again. > Pound didn't write an error to daemon/syslog in the case of PARM. So I > think it was correctly spelled. > > Best regards, > > Ingo > > > -- > To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to > [email protected]. > Please contact [email protected] for questions. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected]. Please contact [email protected] for questions.
