Since this patch is working very well, can someone tell me about the chances this code will be adopted in the main trunk? And if so, will this be in the 2.6 release? And if so, what is the estimated month of the 2.6 release? I ask these questions because we like the idea of stable and maintained code on our production servers :)
Thanks! Steven -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Joe Gooch [mailto:[email protected]] Verzonden: woensdag 5 januari 2011 17:21 Aan: [email protected] Onderwerp: RE: [Pound Mailing List] RE: Website stalls every 60 seconds I wouldn't even consider it for anything other than UNIX domain sockets. Even so, I'm not sure adding another network based call-response protocol to every request is going to solve any of our problems. I would think local memory and synchronization, even with locking, would be faster. Then again, without proper benchmarking I can't be sure. :) Since my patch will allow creation of sessions even when the client doesn't give one, you might want to rerun your benchmarking w/ ab. Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Steven van der Vegt [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:24 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Pound Mailing List] RE: Website stalls every 60 seconds > > Just something that came to mind: what about using memcached? You can > provide an expire parameter. This invalidates old items automatically. > -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected]. Please contact [email protected] for questions. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected]. Please contact [email protected] for questions.
