Hello Hesam,

 

Thank you for the link. I've read this page before and it is actually
what I used as a guide to set up Pound. However I don't see anywhere on
the page that describes how to set up transparent error forwarding. I
only see information about setting up custom static error pages using
the ErrXXX directives. These directives are not what I'm looking for. I
want Pound to forward error messages generated by backend servers to
clients/browsers, but Pound simply substitutes it's own error message:
"An internal server error occurred"

 

Amal

 

From: hesam mohamadian [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 12:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] passing server http errors through

 

Hi , Amal Please see this link you can get your answer there 
https://calomel.org/pound.html
with a best wishes , Hesam

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Amal Graafstra <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi all,

I've been using pound as a reverse proxy for a little while now, and I
love it. It allows me to host a plethora of web services across a
diverse server landscape (windows, *nix, micro, etc.) while conserving
public IP address space.

My question though is this; is it possible to allow pound to
pass-through HTTP error messages from the server to the client? For
example, a backend server hits an error and dumps out the details that
caused the error, however those details are replaced by pound with a
simple "An internal server error occurred". I don't want to use Err500
to serve up a static file, I'd like to be able to pass the actual
backend error to the browser through pound. Is that possible?

Thanks,
Amal

--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected].
Please contact [email protected] for questions.

 

Reply via email to