Yes, well use Debian Squeeze on all machines. so i can easily use
masquerading/NAT and a pound-driven cluster for our HA-Website parallel
on our loadbalancers?
martin
On 11/17/11 5:15 PM, Joe Gooch wrote:
Assuming it's a linux or similar unix, you would do that with normal
iptables(or similar) rules.
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Seener [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 11:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Pound Mailing List] Pound in conjunction with normal
Routing/NAT
Hello everyone.
we want to use pound on two of our load-balancers (active/passive w.
keepalived)
but we also have normal monitor server behind which is not part of the
LB-Cluster.
is it possible to normally route it through the pound-LBs without being
balanced?
we need http, ssh and a VPN to it - it can be a normal public IP route
or a NAT-Route.
Thanks for you help!
Martin
On 11/17/11 4:57 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Hello Martin Seener<[email protected]>,
you are now subscribed to Pound Mailing List.
Send your mails to: [email protected]
If you want to unsubscribe from Pound Mailing List,
send a mail with subject (not body!):
unsubscribe
to: [email protected]
Yours, [email protected]
--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to
[email protected].
Please contact [email protected] for questions.
--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected].
Please contact [email protected] for questions.
--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected].
Please contact [email protected] for questions.
