* include file, include dir/Joe Gooch include file is already supported include 
dir is dangerous, as the file inclusion order is unpredictable - rejected

 

Can't this be alphabetically?

 
-----Original message-----
From: Robert Segall <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat 04-02-2012 17:55
To: [email protected]; 
Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Pound 2.7


So here is a summary of all the feature requests I have seen until now,
as well as some comments on my part:

* protocol selection (SSL v2/v3/TLS)/Martin Meredith
 good idea - accepted for 2.7

* thread load instrumentation/Leo
 accepted for 2.7

* dynamically growing number of threads/Leo
 I don't really see what do you gain by it. Care to clarify?

* detect -Wno-unused-result support/Joe Gooch
 already done - will be in 2.7a (slipped out of 2.6 by mistake)

* dynamic back-end address (DNS) or change via poundctl/Rob Moore
 we'll need to look at how complex the implementation is
 for regular back-ends probably OK, for SSL may be a little tricky
 probably OK for 2.7

* SSL Ciphers (BEAST)/Joe Gooch
 accepted for 2.7

* Client Renegotiation/Joe Gooch
 accepted for 2.7

* SSLv2 should be disabled by default/Joe Gooch
 superseded by protocol selection

* CSRF issue w/ invalid tags/et al in redirects/Joe Gooch
 accepted for 2.7

* config reload/Erik Hensema
 not as easy as it looks - suggestions are welcome

* session cookies by Pound/Francisco Ruiz
 needs more discussion. It would break the proxy transparency

* enhanced alive test: 200/503 reply rather than connect/Francisco Ruiz
 needs more discussion. Can be easily supported now via external
 scripts, so it's not clear we need it

* include file, include dir/Joe Gooch
 include file is already supported
 include dir is dangerous, as the file inclusion order is unpredictable
 - rejected

* ForceHTTP10/ssl unclean shutdown functionality based on user agent/Joe
 Gooch
 needs more analysis, but looks OK
 
* Socket ownership and permissions/Joe Gooch
 accepted for 2.7

* PCRE-based dynamic redirects/Joe Gooch
 needs more analysis

* NoSSL redirect/Joe Gooch
 I think it is (mostly ?) supported by existing redirect mechanism

* back-end clusters/Todd Freeman
 can be done via multiple includes of same file - rejected

Please feel free to comment on the above, or any other features I
missed.
-- 
???Robert Segall
Apsis GmbH
Postfach, Uetikon am See, CH-8707
Tel: +41-32-512 30 19


--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected].
Please contact [email protected] for questions.

Reply via email to