One backend. no session affinity as it does not apply On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Joe Gooch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Do you have 1 or many backends?**** > > Are you using session affinity?**** > > ** ** > > Joe**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Ansar Mohammed [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 11, 2012 2:27 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Pound Mailing List] Terminal Services Gateway**** > > ** ** > > FWIW I really like pound. **** > > **** > > based on several newsgroup postings and the official site NTLM > pass-through is available in 2.6+ and 3.1+**** > > **** > > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/ConnPin**** > > **** > > > > **** > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Joe Gooch <[email protected]> wrote: > **** > > I was similarly curious… Because pound doesn’t do anything to or with > authentication, it just passes the HTTP traffic as is.**** > > **** > > I would think w/ NTLM, however, it’s possible dns and nat type situations > may play into things. (how does the client connect to the domain > controller/KDC)**** > > **** > > Have you tried it with Squid, and/or why do you feel squid will do the job? > **** > > **** > > Joe**** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* Ansar Mohammed [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:19 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Pound Mailing List] Terminal Services Gateway**** > > **** > > Understood, pound does not authenticate users.**** > > **** > > Consider the following:**** > > I have an Exchange 2010 Server with Outlook Anywhere(RPC over HTTP) > working perfectly fine with Basic Authentication. From the time I switch > Exchange 2010 to NTLM, Outlook Anywhere ceases to function. If however I > bypass pound, Outlook Anywhere with NTLM works fine.**** > > **** > > Based on my test it seems that pound does not like NTLM authentication. > Which is why Terminal Services gateway does not work (it uses NTLM).**** > > **** > > **** > > > **** > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Robert Segall <[email protected]> wrote:*** > * > > On Sam, 2012-12-08 at 20:21 -0500, Ansar Mohammed wrote: > > Hello All, > > There has been a few discussions on this list around pound, Terminal > > Services Gateway and the lack of NTLM support. > > Is that something that is on the roadmap for pound, or should I just > > switch to squid?**** > > Forgive my curiosity, but what is your use case? Pound does no > authentication, so I don't see how that would be useful. > -- > Robert Segall > Apsis GmbH > Postfach, Uetikon am See, CH-8707 > Tel: +41-32-512 30 19 > > > -- > To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected]. > Please contact [email protected] for questions.**** > > **** > > ** ** >
