Wow, thanks Joe! Keeping 2.6 alive for us xenophobic IT administrators is very 
helpful. :)

-- Jake


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Gooch [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 7:40 AM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Cc: 'Lubomir Rintel'
> Subject: RE: [Pound Mailing List] PCI-DSS Compliance with Pound
> 
> My suggestion to anyone who needs PCI-DSS compliance is to run my branch here:
> https://github.com/goochjj/pound/tree/stage_for_upstream/v2.7b
> 
> Zip here: 
> https://github.com/goochjj/pound/archive/stage_for_upstream/v2.7b.zip
> 
> This is based on 2.7b, and includes a bunch of patches that I usually include 
> in pound, to
> do things like SNI, CertDir includes, IncludeDir, PCRE redirects, etc.
> 
> 
> If you don't feel comfortable running a 2.7 branch, or don't want to include 
> those
> patches, I've rolled a new branch:
> https://github.com/goochjj/pound/tree/pcidss/v2.6
> Zip here: https://github.com/goochjj/pound/archive/pcidss/v2.6.zip
> 
> Which includes only the XSRF, SSLv2, SSL compression and cipher enhancements 
> against a 2.6
> baseline.
> 
> 
> Joe
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andreas Hilboll [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 4:34 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: Lubomir Rintel
> > Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] PCI-DSS Compliance with Pound
> >
> > Hi Lubomir,
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> > >     For 2011-3389, I need to disable ciphers deemed unsecure. The
> > solution
> > >     for Apache would be this:
> > >
> > >        SSLHonorCipherOrder On
> > >        SSLCipherSuite RC4-SHA:HIGH:!ADH
> > >
> > >
> > > Pound 2.7a contains a fix, at GoodData we use the following
> > configuration:
> > >
> > >         Ciphers "!EXPORT:!SSLv2:!MD5:!aNULL:!NULL:!LOW:RC4:RSA:ALL"
> > >         SSLHonorCipherOrder 1
> > >
> >
> > So this won't work on 2.6? Is there a patch available for 2.6? I'm not
> > too keen on using a version which is labeled "experimental".
> >
> >
> > >     For 2012-4929, I need to turn off SSL Compression.
> > >
> > >
> > > This is what we use to address the issue (not sure what's needed in
> > > order to get that patch merged):
> > >
> > > http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2013/2013-
> > 02/136076601000
> > > 0#1360766010000
> >
> > From the message I can't tell whether the patch is for 2.6 or 2.7. Can
> > you enlighten me? I'd really like to stick to 2.6.
> >
> > > You need to rebuild your package.
> >
> > No problem, as I'm already doing that (I need a larger MAXBUF setting
> > than used in the Debian packageS).
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Andreas.
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to
> > [email protected].
> > Please contact [email protected] for questions.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected].
> Please contact [email protected] for questions.



--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected].
Please contact [email protected] for questions.

Reply via email to