Thanx a lot for your answer, it's always good to speak to people and the experiences.
On Jun 21, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Scott McKeown <[email protected]> wrote: > This is quite an old blog post and very lax on any real information. > > It does not say what the server setup is as in is Pound on its own hardware > with HAProxy directing traffic to different backend servers it also does not > say what version of Pound is being used or even what the spec of the hardware > is. > > I've got Pound build on about 5 personal production units and god knows how > many customers are using Pound for the SSL Termination and HAProxy to handle > the loadbalancing at Layer7 with no problems at all. > > To be honest I would say that this post is out of date and as long as you are > running the latest build on a dedicated 'Load Balancer' your should be fine. > > > ~Scott > > > On 21 June 2013 00:27, Peter Shaw <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > we stumbled over this Article form 2008: > http://blog.emmettshear.com/post/2008/03/03/Dont-use-Pound-for-load-balancing > It says that the CPU Load of pound is a real problem. I never had those > problems back in 200x, what i have was RAM issues. > Can anyone tell me if this is real and how this was fixed? > > Thanx a lot, > pm > -- > To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to [email protected]. > Please contact [email protected] for questions. > > > > -- > With Kind Regards. > > Scott McKeown > Loadbalancer.org > http://www.loadbalancer.org
