> Christian COMMARMOND <christian.commarm...@gmail.com > <mailto:christian.commarm...@gmail.com>> kirjoitti 17.6.2017 kello 16.39: > > I know that this is completely not connected to pound... But I feel, being > quite dumb myself on thse subjects, that to include these explanations to > pound documentation would help people to create a 'complete' solution of > routing. And I would like to use the same server that I already use for > pound, because this is the one which manage my SSL keys already (I use Let's > Encrypt). >
Pound is not and will not be the solution you are after. It lags behind in http features also (no web socket) and nginx may be a better solution for someone for http proxying. I still use Pound but I suffer for the missing features syndrome. haproxy is the ultimate proxy you are after. It has features for http proxy, ssl and tcp proxy separately. It can do what you want. I use haproxy in addition to Pound, because haproxy has not all the http features Pound has. I use it for tcp proxy solution and I am happy with that. Jari Fredriksson Bitwell Oy +358 400 779 440 ja...@bitwell.fi <mailto:ja...@bitwell.fi> Dev: https://www.bitwell.fi Ops: https://www.bitwell.biz
