--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alex Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do(Variable) becomes acceptable?
I seconded that and waited for Bruce's reply ...
Now I become skeptical about it, otherwise Bruce would have allowed
this from the start, I wonder.
What might be a reason I can think of atm is the support for the
internal commands "*...".
Consider, e.g., Do("Note").
Should PP search for "note.exe" or parse an internal command "*Note"
to give an error of "missing ...".
Maybe this confusion can be avoided by forcing explicit extension ".exe"
for the apps or forcing "*" for the internal commands.
However, both seem not feasible since they are against widely-granted
conventions. Or allowing a combined internal command as do("Note Open")
might work, but it doesn't seem feasible either.
The only way seemed promising to me is to not support at all
the internal commands in do() syntax, since now PP supports
plugin-like call for the internal commands.
But it may need a poll, if Bruce acknowledges it, since there might
be some people who already used internal commands widely in
do() syntax ...
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/JV_rlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/power-pro/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
