> What I can allow for is > wait.for(expression-without-commas, expression) as the first form > which means I can parse without using general expression parser from > start.
Sorry, this is wrong as it also will lead to problems with wait.for (expression) when expression contains a comma. So I am going to leave as is. I hope Do works... Attention: PowerPro's Web site has moved: http://www.ppro.org Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/power-pro/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
