--- In [email protected], "entropyreduction" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "mockey_a" <mockey@> wrote:
>
> > x = 1234
> > win.debug(cb("lab", x)) outputs
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED](?|1234|)
> > where | is in fact replaced by a char with hex value less than
> > 0x20.
>
> One question, one suggestion:
>
> I assume when you determine what | will be, i.e. which hex value
less
> than 0x20, you scan the string to be inserted to make sure there's
no
> collision?


I don't right now.  It uses 0x02. I might add, I guess.   But I
could not make it fool proof (pun intended).  >


> And: callbacks in same cases are not to a label in the same script,
> but to a separate, named script.  But your parameter processing
could
> be useful either in that situation too.  Maybe
>
> you produce
>
>    cbs(scriptname, label, arg1, arg2...)
>

I thought about this.  Probably simpler just to use
cb("[EMAIL PROTECTED]",...) ; pp just adds .
cb("@label",...)  ;; PP adds scriptname.
cb("script",...) ;; pp adds just .

this would break anybody that had used beta, but cleaner than two
functions I think.  I'll switch to this unless you can think of a
reason not too.





Attention: PowerPro's Web site has moved: http://www.ppro.org



SPONSORED LINKS
Computer monitoring software Power pro Computer and internet software
Free computer monitoring software


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to