--- In [email protected], Cüneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > swzoh wrote (on 01.09.2006 11:42): > > > I'm not sure if brief comments are helpful. I always felt awkward > > about how detailed the comments should be. Maybe better discuss the > > details in the forum than just commenting the script? > > Even brief comments are better than nothing. After all, not everyone > digs the scripts out of the threads but downloads them from Files-sect. > If I'm not mistaken, this has been probably the longest thread in > PP-group ever, and I've really lost track of what ColorZoomer does > in its latest version (I see you're uploading 5-6 copies a day).
They were mostly cosmetic ones. If I didn't announce it in the forum, nothing to care about until I post about it. I just did it as I tended to forgot about cosmetic stuffs recently. Here where I live, uploading this small size of file is as easy as saving to the hard disk. And as I always customized my version, mostly removed what are unnecessary to me, like close button and naturally the last event before the quit, I can't just upload what I'm using as it is. So, whenever I modified it, I also modified the one in the file section before I forgot it if time allowed. So, really nothing to loose track about. Anyway, it's just a script, all is there, nothing under the hood like undocumented API's. > And even so, I've little idea how it works, all I see is a bunch of > cryptical dll-calls. It's almost not PP-scripting anymore, rather > black magic :) So, a brief comment would help the situation? I bet you always feel that way no matter how detailed the comments are, until you read documentations about the API's used. > > Anyway, because > > of this, I tried to make the script just procedual as possible as > > I can. I tried to avoid even [EMAIL PROTECTED] too. > > I don't get what procedurality has to do with comments? Maybe it's me, however, I don't think I've ever helped by the comments in the scripts. I always tried to understand the scripts by the codes themselves. So, what mostly irritated me were the ones to make me jump from here to there, which greatly reduced my concentrations. IMHO, good scripts which deepen understandings on whatever are not the one with detailed comments, but the one to keep concentrations on until the end. > Don't get me wrong, I just wanna collaborate than watch. IMO it > helps few of us that you publish your scripts, you could as well > write plugins for these functionalities. But it's your decision at > the end. I don't understand. There can't be anything hidden in my script. Isn't it one of the merits of the scripts over the plugins and executables: nothing under the hood? Anyway, if you think I better not post the scripts, I'll not, no problem with me. OTOH, you must understand writing plugins instead is not easy to me. I'd inevitably feel a barrier, at least psychologically. I've never studied/coded on C/C++, and even never complied anything written in them myself. So, writing a script is whole lot easier to me than trying to write a plugin. Sean Attention: PowerPro's Web site has moved: http://www.ppro.org Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/power-pro/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
