--- In [email protected], "Sheri" <sheri...@...> wrote:
>
> Don't forget to update the date in the string returned by regex.version.

okay

> Working on the doc update. Is the new version number going to be 2.0.6?

whatever regex.version returns now.

> --- In [email protected], "Sheri" <sherip99@> wrote:
> >
> > New plugin options bsr_unicode and bsr_anycrlf are working
> > correctly. 
>  
> Spoke too soon there.
> 
> With bsr_unicode option ?"\R" should match "\x85" at position 1. It
> does. It should match "abcde\x85" at postion 6. It gets "No match".
> Correct result is obtained when the pattern uses the internal option
> equivalent to bsr_unicode.

Dunno what that's about.  I'll double check code, but I think I just
map e.g. bsr_unicode into whatever the PCRE_*** const was.  

Meanwhile: regexTest_090116.zip: try 

local sScript = "." ++ scriptname ++ "@callback" 

local sScript = cbx("@callback", "yes")
then
local sScript = cbx("@callback")

btw in he l;ater case, sure script not being cached by PP?




Reply via email to