--- In [email protected], "brucexs" <bswit...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "entropyreduction" > <alancampbelllists+yahoo@> wrote: > > > > Right, then problem has gotta be something I changed in com dll. > > > I think you may have answered this before, but is there even a need to > support unload? Maybe just need to some kind of interface to "free any com > objects that have references on them (that were created in the plugin). In > fact, you could just do that and only that in the unload. > > The memory for the com plugin itself has got to be trivial...
BTW, I would have to add something to exe as well so that it does not do a freelibrary on unload... >
