--- In [email protected], "entropyreduction" <alancampbelllists+ya...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Sheri" <sherip99@> wrote: > > > OK, then if you feel like pursuing, it could be something like: > > > > local ustring=unicode.append_fromnum(0x00BC,0x0020,0x215...) > > That should be doable. > > In the meantime: unicodePlugin0.73_090730.zip in > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/power-pro/files/0_TEMP_/AlansPluginProvisional/ > > ustring.set_char(0, 0x00BC) > > works for me. Does it for you?
Yes, and also ustring.set_char(0, "n", 0x00BC) seems to work. > > unicode.set_char() will not work. > > set_char is alias for set_chars and work only via a handle > I can change that, if you desperately want both to be full services > No. But unless one happens to see the line in the documetation that italicized functions only work in handle format, it seems wrong that, e.g., unicode.set_char(ustring,0,"n",0x00BC) gives the erroneous function error. Maybe somehow you could make the alias limitation harder to miss.
