Hi Sheri, you said:
> I suppose it would be possible (if you want) to implement a second set of > signals in the format string > such as x, y, z instead of l, u, t (lower, upper, title). Would there ever be reason to use the l, u, t case modifiers even though target was UTF-8?, E.g. if you knew target was only among the contained lower 127 characters? Then for efficiency having the second set of signals might be useful...
