> I can imagine times when scripter would want to let go of a com resource > before end of script. I suppose could do that by
There is nothing wrong with keeping release if you like. But it can lead to dangling references. obj1 = com.create //... obj2 = obj1 //... obj1.release Now obj2 is meaningless. But if scripters are willing to live with that, then fine. No need for special syntax for release.
