This looks like it is related to the C-state policy issue. cpuidle along with menu governor will fix this, but cpuidle is currently out of mm tree. It should get back into acpi-test and mm tree in a day or two. Will let you know when that happens. Thanks, Venki
________________________________ From: Arjan van de Ven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 5/21/2007 3:42 PM To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh Subject: [Fwd: Re: does hpet help save the power ?] -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: does hpet help save the power ? Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 16:27:03 +0200 From: Alexey Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I made a mistake in my last post. So the lowest state with PIT is C4 C0 1,9% C1 0% C2 0% C3 0% C4 98,1% Are the any workaround with HPET? or this is not a bug and there is better to use PIT? Regards Alex > > the difference PIT with HPET on lowest usage for CPU are conservations > states, > for PIT it looks like: > C0 1,9% > C1 0% > C2 0% > C3 98,1% > > for HPET: > C0 0% > C1 0% > C2 36,5% > C3 40,7% > C4 22,8% -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGUFq3VVCoNUmKuAcRAgj+AKDDqup4VfVjxS2yrIYwhe6A6IJ0uACgwAy2 n3IgewfSvXeN3xm/0/S9Usc= =yVTu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Power mailing list [email protected] http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
_______________________________________________ Power mailing list [email protected] http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
