Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:58:27 +0400 Stas Sergeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti:
> Maybe something like the attached patch > can do instead? I haven't tested, but it > seems in case of (ctxp->active && IS_STREAM_TRACE) > the select() is never executed at all, so > 100% of CPU will be consumed no matter what. > I did such a patch for the server interface, > and it was applied. Of course it doesn't > make it inevitably correct, but noone complained > since, and consuming 100% of CPU is certainly > unacceptable. > Though for the server interface I managed to > reduce the CPU usage much further with a few > simple tricks. Yes, looks better. I tried not to modify anything else, but just make it not poll when idle, so I left that condition of bypassing select() altogether alone. For me, this patch seems to work just as well and is less complex code, so I'm all for it. -- Niko Kiirala [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://niko.kiirala.com/ _______________________________________________ Power mailing list [email protected] http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
