Hi, On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:09:12AM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: > I'll do a HZ=100 test run now and possibly further code investigation > as time permits, however one thing is obvious: compared to other > timer system activity this one is very visible and should be tackled > one way or another.
OK, with HZ=100 I now always get _exactly_ 50,0 neigh table wakeups: 38,6% ( 50,2) lisa : neigh_add_timer (neigh_timer_handler) 38,5% ( 50,0) <kernel core> : neigh_table_init_no_netlink (neigh_periodic_ti (and I conveniently managed to catch the rare lisa activity here as well) Not sure what this different number should tell me, though (after all it's not directly proportional to the 100 <-> 300 change). The only way for me to gain sufficient insight about this would be to dive into the inner handling and interval calculation, tree size etc. again. Andreas Mohr _______________________________________________ Power mailing list [email protected] http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
