I find Windows 95 to run slow on my Dell 386. But it still doesn't
even compare to running OSX on a PowerBook 3400c.
A more reasonable comparison is running Windows XP on a 386.
On Nov 18, 2004, at 10:21 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
You're far more tolerant than I am. A cacheless Wallstreet 233 is
barely faster than a 3400/240, and I've run OS X on a 3400/240 and
it's not the greatest experience in the world. It's about like
running Windows 95 on a 386DX-40, for those of you with experience
with the x86 world.
--
PowerBooks is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...
Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A |
-- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299 | Free iBook! |
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
PowerBooks list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/powerbooks.shtml>
--> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/powerbooks%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
