C. A. Niemiec said: >I can pull a specific person's (smart folder) account to the top of my >Folder List if it's getting more activity (I'm assuming user-resortable >Folder Lists -- _CTM, see how useful this can be?_ :) ). Or, if there's >a lull, I could drop that smart list back into the IBM folder like a >subfolder (is it now called a "smart sub-folder"?). > >Assuming I have many corporate accounts, I could make a "most active" >folder and pull all the busy smart sub-folders into it. Then I could >delete them when done, or tuck them away in relevant containing folders >as with the IBM example above. What I wouldn't be doing is having to >clear out lots of filters from my filters list that have long passed on >their usefulness because the messages they direct are no longer arriving, >or even in the active database because they've been archived. > >I'm sure people with more e-mail than I could find better examples. > >Mikael, is that clear enough?
Well, yes and no. I understand the solution, but not fully the problems being addressed by it. It's a very interesting discussion though. Please stay in the discussion all of you! I think we're on something fundamental here. PM 5.2.3 Swedish | OS X 10.3.9 | Powerbook G4/400Mhz | 1GB RAM | 30GB HD
