H.R. Riggs said: >You're stating the obvious. End of discussion.
It certainly was obvoius from you earlier message that you speculated on what CTM should do : >that rather than spend the time updating the UI at >this point, I think the handling of attachments can be improved. While this coudln't be regarded "telling", others have crossed that line before, so I was addresing to others beside yourself as well. In the context of the discussion the above was the only thing you offered. Basically you were effectively saying something like: "I don't regard this a problem. Here is another problem I'd like to have solved _instead_. " I only pointed out that we could discuss ideas and points WITHOUT putting differing features against each other (or putting the differing needs for different users against each other). Obviously this was not so obvious to you. Try again? PM 5.2.1 | OS X 10.3.9 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD
