How 'bout a compromise of sorts. For those of us who like plain text email and those who want some minimal html markup. See if we can get CTM to integrate Markdown conversion. That way simple formatting will be available as plain text input.
I know it's more difficult than it sounds but I'm wondering if an AppleScript set for outgoing could grab message content run it through Markdown.pl and return the HTML fragment to the outgoing message. I have no idea how PM would handle sending HMTL fragments so it may not work. -- Andy Fragen On Mon, Mar 7, 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >As Hiro points out there is a huge debate about email. I feel that many >of us who only use text only are losing the battle though. However, a >great deal of PM users use the product because it is only a text email >application. However, there is a way to send HTML, but this is a >workaround (sending the HTML file as an attachment with no body has >already posted). The PowerMail staff has been adding limited (and better) >support for HTML, but it's a balancing act. > >There are just as many reasons for not having HTML emails as there are to >having it, but end the end it's a religious war. > >Wayne > >-----Original Message----- >From: A-NO-NE Music <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Mar 7, 2005 9:32 AM >To: PowerMail Discussions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Love PowerMail but... > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] / 05.3.6 / 09:12 PM wrote: > >>The only feature I miss is being able to format outgoing text for those >>who receive HTML mail. > > >You'd be interested to know that we the long-time PM users are who >believe email should be nothing but plain text :-) > > >-- > >- Hiro > >[PROTECTED] ><[PROTECTED]> <[PROTECTED]> > > > > > >
