The native OS X version of the Runtime Solution for eMA (to allow use of
the program without FileMaker Pro) worked just fine, and I was able to
test the program.

Unfortunately, as Wayne predicted, the encoding for two-byte characters
(messages in Japanese) was trashed, and all archived Japanese text is
displayed as strings of question marks in the message body.

Needless to say, this limits the usefulness of the program for me, as
about 10% of my mail traffic is in Japanese, or contains some Japanese
characters.

At the present time, my main PowerMail database is, like most people,
several thousand (about 20,000) messages.  I have had only one database
problem in a year of PM use, and it's own fixit utility took care of
that.  I have no speed problems with PM, either, despite the message volume.

So why am I intersted in eMA?  Searches.  (are you listening Jerome?)  PM
has the weakest search functions of any major e-mail app I've seen.  For
the record, Eudora had the best.  Entourage has good search functions,
but peformance is horrible, taking FOREVER to complete a search (15
minutes or more to complete a body text search on 20,000+ messages on my
previous Titanium PB/800).  I want to be able to search on a specific
header or the body, for a specific word or phrase, and show exact matches
only, quickly and easily.  With PM, I get huge numbers of hits that I
have to wade through in a time-consuming way.  Some of the "hits" don't
even contain the words I've searched for at times!  I don't know if it's
a Sherlock-engine issue or what (I'm no programmer), but just reverse-
engineer Eudora or something.  It's searches were brilliant.

Maybe I'm not using it right.  Or maybe it will be improved.  Of course,
I cannot study the software myself to see if I'm using it correctly,
because there's no updated manual!  The one supplied with the software is
three years old and for a previous version.  And none of the recent
improvements have been documented anywhere either.

Sorry to gripe here, Jerome, I love PM or I wouldn't be using it, but for
a PAID program not to have proper documentation supplied is just not
cool.  This cannot be winked away as a cute idiosyncrasy just because the
users on this list tend to be reasonably computer-literate.  There's a
lot of freeware floating around that's far better documented.  None of
this would irritate me this much if it wasn't the single most important
application on my computer.

When the developer adds AppleScript support, the superb GyazMail may very
well end up as my primary e-mail app if these issues are not resolved.

---

Scott T. Hards
President
HobbyLink Japan (www.hlj.com)


Reply via email to