Hi Michael,
about two years I used PM 3 (before Claris Emailer) and I have just
switched to PM 4.
And it is worth it!
For me it seems to be much more faster under Jaguar and don't forget that
you are able to use the MacOS X inbuilt spell checker. And then there are
some features that you don't see if you only glance over.
Yes, Claris Emailer was a great e-mail software but PM is a dignified
successor. Even the keyboard shortcuts are almost the same.
Juergen
>Subject: PM 3 under Jaguar 10.2.5, possible but limited?
>From: "Michael Byström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 10:43:51 +0200
>
>I just installed PM 3.1.1 under OS X 10.2.5 to test my PM 3 key and it
>seems to work to my surprise. But is it at all feasible to run PM 3 under
>Jaguar, even if you accept that there will be limitations? And just what
>are those limitations? Can someone please jog my memory just what the
>issues are with PM 3 and Jaguar? As I recall it v 4 was the first Jaguar
>compatible version of PM, but exactly what that meant I've forgot.
>
>I suppose I could accept smaller issues for a shorter time span, as mail
>could be left on the server until my evaluation time is over.
>
>My objective here is to test PM 3 Live during a month or so, before I
>decide to pay for the upgrade to v 4. Remembering all the differences of
>course between versions. I guess I have hard time making up my mind,
>because here I am in 2003 still using Emailer 2. It works as well as
>ever, but I'm fedup with having to boot classic just for checking my mail.
>
>If Gyazmail would keep messages in a database instead of in separate
>message files and wouldn't separate the accounts, I really think that
>would have been where ended up, but for now PM is back on the horizon.
