Be careful what you wish for! IMHO it's far better to be in charge of your own censorship rather then farm it out to persons unknown. Part of the problem with accurately tagging spam is that different people get different kinds of messages. So although it may seem inefficient, it's best to keep the spam tagging locally done, so you can easily correct it if it makes a mistake, and you have easy access to your spam to do so.
It's a far more difficult task to correctly id spam for a large group of people, rather than just one person. In my testing, no anti-spam product even comes close to Spam-Sieve! It's just the best! Best, Dave N in reply to ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Chris's message of 12:56 AM, 7/6/07 >Much of this *should* be accomplished by my ISP who subscribe to the >Cloudmark anti-spam service. Since most of the spam is the usual porn/ >meds stuff which Spamsieve identifies with no problem, I can only assume >Cloudmark is not very good
