powermail-discuss Digest #2724 - Saturday, November 3, 2007
Re: OS 10.5 compatibility
by "Bob Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PowerMail(TM) Leopard issues...
by "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: PowerMail(TM) Leopard issues...
by "CTM info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: PowerMail(TM) Leopard issues...
by "Marlyse Comte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: PowerMail(TM) Leopard issues...
by "listes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: PowerMail(TM) Leopard issues...
by "Matthias Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: My Leopard issues...
by "A-NO-NE Music" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: OS 10.5 compatibility
From: "Bob Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:57:36 -0700
A bit more on the keychain issues.
I did do the keychain first aid as someone mentioned. (I had never seen
that command before). All of the errors shown were in PM related passwords.
PM accounts that had the password in the keychain would work fine for a
"connect..." connection, but would fail for a schedule. No warning or
error message, the connection just did not happen.
PM accounts that did not use the keychain worked fine, both for manual
connections and schedules.
Now, when I moved to Leopard, the first thing I tried to run was PM and
that was before I knew of the keychain patch, and I met all the
requirements for having the keychain fail. Maybe if I would have run
the patch first, it would have been different.
Bob
*************************************************************************
Bob Parks [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.kidsource.com
"Luckily time does not fly or it would always be crashing"
Bill Gieskieng
*************************************************************************
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: PowerMail(TM) Leopard issues...
From: "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:05:02 -0400
Friday, November 2, 2007 at 6:04 PM *Ocean City* Standard Time
Hi Paul,
I'm not on Leopard, but as you predicted, the usual road bumps are
rearing their ugly heads. This, on PowerMail(TM) in the OSX forum:
>....next problem was with PowerMail and passwords. This was fixed by
>using Keychain Access' First Aid feature and all my passwords were restored.
>
>Now my issues:
>
>#1 -- I cannot send any e-mails, as I get the following error message
>
>A network interface error occurred
>
>Class=NetP; what=100; when=1
>
>#2 -- PowerMail won't Hide anymore.
>
>#3 -- SpamSieve is having issues as well (SLOW loading, non-responsive)
>
>I've been a PowerMail user since Claris eMailer had problems with Mac OS
>X, but I'm about ready to revert back to the new version of Apple Mail
>and use Intego's Personal Antispam X4.
>
>Fabian
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: PowerMail(TM) Leopard issues...
From: "CTM info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 23:15:54 +0100
Hello all,
A quick note to let you know that we are committed to making sure
PowerMail 5.6, which contains undisclosed improvements, will be fully
qualified for 10.5 which is now our main operating system in house.
Cheers,
jean michel / ctm qa
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:05:02 -0400, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Friday, November 2, 2007 at 6:04 PM *Ocean City* Standard Time
>
>Hi Paul,
>
>I'm not on Leopard, but as you predicted, the usual road bumps are
>rearing their ugly heads. This, on PowerMail(TM) in the OSX forum:
>
>>....next problem was with PowerMail and passwords. This was fixed by
>>using Keychain Access' First Aid feature and all my passwords were restored.
>>
>>Now my issues:
>>
>>#1 -- I cannot send any e-mails, as I get the following error message
>>
>>A network interface error occurred
>>
>>Class=NetP; what=100; when=1
>>
>>#2 -- PowerMail won't Hide anymore.
>>
>>#3 -- SpamSieve is having issues as well (SLOW loading, non-responsive)
>>
>>I've been a PowerMail user since Claris eMailer had problems with Mac OS
>>X, but I'm about ready to revert back to the new version of Apple Mail
>>and use Intego's Personal Antispam X4.
>>
>>Fabian
>>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: PowerMail(TM) Leopard issues...
From: "Marlyse Comte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 21:57:55 -0500
but on the other hand, I am also a user and also on leopard since last
friday and no problems whatsoever on leopard with powermail - so far.
obviously milage varies and not all is bad and for me right now good.
---marlyse
------------ former message(s) quotes: -------------
>
>Friday, November 2, 2007 at 6:04 PM *Ocean City* Standard Time
>
>Hi Paul,
>
>I'm not on Leopard, but as you predicted, the usual road bumps are
>rearing their ugly heads. This, on PowerMail(TM) in the OSX forum:
>
>>....next problem was with PowerMail and passwords. This was fixed by
>>using Keychain Access' First Aid feature and all my passwords were restored.
>>
>>Now my issues:
>>
>>#1 -- I cannot send any e-mails, as I get the following error message
>>
>>A network interface error occurred
>>
>>Class=NetP; what=100; when=1
>>
>>#2 -- PowerMail won't Hide anymore.
>>
>>#3 -- SpamSieve is having issues as well (SLOW loading, non-responsive)
>>
>>I've been a PowerMail user since Claris eMailer had problems with Mac OS
>>X, but I'm about ready to revert back to the new version of Apple Mail
>>and use Intego's Personal Antispam X4.
>>
>>Fabian
>>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: PowerMail(TM) Leopard issues...
From: "listes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 09:36:04 +0100
CTM info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A quick note to let you know that we are committed to making sure
> PowerMail 5.6, which contains undisclosed improvements, will be fully
> qualified for 10.5 which is now our main operating system in house.
Thanks for this Jean Michel
--
remove ".listes" and add a dot after fh please
enlevez ".listes" et ajoutez un point après fh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: PowerMail(TM) Leopard issues...
From: "Matthias Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 13:43:45 +0100
CTM info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A quick note to let you know that we are committed to making sure
> PowerMail 5.6, which contains undisclosed improvements, will be fully
> qualified for 10.5 which is now our main operating system in house.
Sounds like good news :-)
Looking forward to the new version.
Thanks and all the best
Matthias
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: My Leopard issues...
From: "A-NO-NE Music" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 10:41:48 -0400
I am loving Leopard. But PM is sucking 600+MB of physical memory. Man.
--
- Hiro
Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA
<http://a-no-ne.com> <http://anonemusic.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of powermail-discuss Digest
