Jeremy Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

>> Anyway, even if the mail database was split into several databases, you
>> could still run against the 2 GB limit.
>
> Yes, and you could split a large folder into two smaller folders to deal
> with this.

Yes, you could, but it's an awkward solution. For example, I have set up
folders for the 15+ mailing lists I'm on. Some contain just a few
hundred of mails, the largest one nearly 12.000, but that's OK -- I
wouldn't want to arbitrarily divide these 12.000 mails into different
subfolders.

>> Wouldn't lifting the 2 GB limit be a more straight-forward remedy?
>
> Maybe, but PowerMail have said they're not going to do this.

"Not going to do this" as in "never ever"? I don't think so. CTM doesn't
seem to believe the 2 GB limit creates a serious issue for the
overwhelming majority of users, but when this limit should detract a
growing number of potential customers from using PowerMail, I am
convinced they would take the trouble of lifting this restriction, even
if it means converting a lot of code from 32 to 64 bits.

> In any case, it doesn't solve the backup problem.

Neither does the multiple database approach. But it's a different
problem anyway. The main issue with Time Machine backups is the risk of
corruption, but the ball is in Apple's court here. With Apple's own
Aperture being incompatible with Time Machine precisely because of the
risk of creating corruption, I think it's prudent to wait and see what
Apple's going to do about it.

> As you said, you don't use email very heavily and your database is much
> smaller than 2 GB. For those of us who have larger databases, the way
> that PowerMail currently behaves is a problem.

Until today, I would have said I do use email heavily; it's my main
means of communication in my job. I just don't keep that many mails,
even when I would keep a mail rather than deleting it when in doubt.
Also, I'm on digest mode on most of the more active mailing lists. I
really wonder how many users of PowerMail actually hit the 2 GB limit
regularly.

- Michael


Michael J. Hußmann

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW (personal): http://michael-hussmann.de
WWW (professional): http://digicam-experts.de


Reply via email to