powermail-discuss Digest #2753 - Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Keychain Bug [was: Password (was DNS restored for PowerMail's ...]
by "Matthias Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Keychain Bug [was: Password (was DNS restored for PowerMail's ...]
by "Raphaël PAREJO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Keychain Bug [was: Password (was DNS restored for PowerMail's ...]
by "Matthias Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Keychain Bug [was: Password (was DNS restored for PowerMail's ...]
by "CTM info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Keychain Bug [was: Password (was DNS restored for PowerMail's ...]
by "Matthias Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Keychain Bug [was: Password (was DNS restored for PowerMail's ...]
From: "Matthias Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:04:30 +0900
Am/On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:55:41 -0500 schrieb/wrote Mark Gerber:
>GWB claims that on 12/11/07 at 10:15 PM
>the NSA never heard Matthias Schmidt say:
>
>>it looks like to be an Intel only issue.
>>It worked fine on my G4 Powerbook.
>
>No, I don't think so: I'm using a G3 upgraded to a G4.
meanwhile I also don't think so anymore.
This morning, after the G4 was shut down, PM started asking for passwords.
This is truly a bug, an annoying bug.
Some of the code changed and some changes did break something.
Why was there no beta test?
Beta-testing is for avoiding such pains on the user side.
Thanks and all the best
Matthias
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Keychain Bug [was: Password (was DNS restored for PowerMail's ...]
From: "Raphaël PAREJO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:13:19 +0100
I experienced the same with my Powerbook G4.
What happens with CTM Development? They now no answer any mail.
Best regards.
--
Raphaël Parejo
________________________________________
Merci pour le message électronique, que j'ai bien reçu/Gracias por su
mensaje/. Ce message, émis le / este mensaje mandado el : Mer 12 déc
2007, par/por Matthias Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED], disait / decía :
>Am/On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:55:41 -0500 schrieb/wrote Mark Gerber:
>
>>GWB claims that on 12/11/07 at 10:15 PM
>>the NSA never heard Matthias Schmidt say:
>>
>>>it looks like to be an Intel only issue.
>>>It worked fine on my G4 Powerbook.
>>
>>No, I don't think so: I'm using a G3 upgraded to a G4.
>
>meanwhile I also don't think so anymore.
>This morning, after the G4 was shut down, PM started asking for passwords.
>
>This is truly a bug, an annoying bug.
>Some of the code changed and some changes did break something.
>Why was there no beta test?
>Beta-testing is for avoiding such pains on the user side.
>
>Thanks and all the best
>
>Matthias
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Keychain Bug [was: Password (was DNS restored for PowerMail's ...]
From: "Matthias Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:30:57 +0900
Am/On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:13:19 +0100 schrieb/wrote Raphaël PAREJO:
>I experienced the same with my Powerbook G4.
>
>What happens with CTM Development? They now no answer any mail.
>
imho they are aware of the problem and investigating it right now.
We will hear from them, after they found a solution.
Meanwhile ... happy debugging ;-)
Thanks and all the best
Matthias
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Keychain Bug [was: Password (was DNS restored for PowerMail's ...]
From: "CTM info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:38:30 +0100
Matthias,
We are dealing with a large number of support e-mails right now. The
reason we did not do an external test was the pressure to release a new
version for Mac OS X 10.5, as we had no access to it before release -
not a good idea, but that's how things happened.
Expect a version 5.6.1 before Friday.
Cheers,
jean michel / ctm qa
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:04:30 +0900, Matthias Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
system.de> wrote:
>meanwhile I also don't think so anymore.
>This morning, after the G4 was shut down, PM started asking for passwords.
>
>This is truly a bug, an annoying bug.
>Some of the code changed and some changes did break something.
>Why was there no beta test?
>Beta-testing is for avoiding such pains on the user side.
>
>Thanks and all the best
>
>Matthias
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Keychain Bug [was: Password (was DNS restored for PowerMail's ...]
From: "Matthias Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:27:18 +0900
Jean Michel,
Am/On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:38:30 +0100 schrieb/wrote CTM info:
>We are dealing with a large number of support e-mails right now. The
>reason we did not do an external test was the pressure to release a new
>version for Mac OS X 10.5, as we had no access to it before release -
everybody is complaining about that, I know.
Actually I don't understand, why is Apple doing that to their developers.
>not a good idea, but that's how things happened.
well in that case I'd post the thing as a public beta and if then sh*t
happens you can always say, ya, guys, we're sorry, but that is beta
software .... ;-)
If it's posted as a final release, people don't expect any major bugs.
Anyway, I'm actually curious, what really happened as the API for the
keychain didn't change.
>
>Expect a version 5.6.1 before Friday.
Good news :-)
best wishes
Matthias
>
>Cheers,
>
>jean michel / ctm qa
>
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:04:30 +0900, Matthias Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>system.de> wrote:
>
>>meanwhile I also don't think so anymore.
>>This morning, after the G4 was shut down, PM started asking for passwords.
>>
>>This is truly a bug, an annoying bug.
>>Some of the code changed and some changes did break something.
>>Why was there no beta test?
>>Beta-testing is for avoiding such pains on the user side.
Thanks and all the best
Matthias
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of powermail-discuss Digest
