That is correct
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 6:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Powernet: Industrial Sandblasting Hoods in the Nuclear Environment Do you mean Bullard series 77, 88 and 88VX? ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Creamer, Charles E Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 11:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Powernet: Industrial Sandblasting Hoods in the Nuclear Environment The models in question are the Arco hoods 77 model, the 88 model, and the 88VX model. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 11:07 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Powernet: Industrial Sandblasting Hoods in the Nuclear Environment Can you supply the make and model of their hoods? Linda ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Creamer, Charles E Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 11:59 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Cowan, Steven Roger Subject: Powernet: Industrial Sandblasting Hoods in the Nuclear Environment What experience do you have with sandblasting activities, using a vendor such as Arco, who has a NIOSH approved sandblasting hood, that may not be rated for radionuclides. In this particular case, the hood is NIOSH approved, with a TC number and is rated for Dusts, Mists, and Fumes, but not rated for Dusts, Mists, and Fumes, and Radionuclides. The hood has an Assigned Protection Factor (APF) of 1000, but the nuclear industry cannot take credit for it, because it is not specifically rated for Dust, Mists, Fumes, and Radionuclides. Clearly, the hood provides protection to the worker, as their end of shift whole body counts are clean, even after working in significant DAC air concentrations, but we cannot technically take credit for the APF. The workers state that lapel air samplers inside the hood can interfere with the seal (boot) in the hood and actually cause them to become contaminated from the interfered seal if they wear a lapel. We would like to know if anyone else has faced this situation and what resolution you have come to. Thank you ************************************************** This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Corporation proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to the Exelon Corporation family of Companies. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout. Thank You. ************************************************** ************************************************** This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Corporation proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to the Exelon Corporation family of Companies. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout. Thank You. **************************************************
