Eric, We record this activity in dpm. I have noticed over the years that there are numerous reporting conventions beyond cpm and dpm such as ccpm and ncpm. It would be nice if there was standardized.
Seth. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Powernet: Recording contamination levels by direct frisk Good Morning, One of our HP Technicians noticed that the Nantel training says fixed/total contamination measurements by direct frisk should be recorded in net counts per minute (ncpm) . Our procedure currently says to record the measurements in disintegrations per minute (dpm). How does your plant document fixed/total contamination measurements by direct frisk on surveys? ncpm? or dpm? We noted that unfortunately this issue was not addressed in the INPO RP standard PP-06-01, Survey Map Conventions. Thanks, Eric Eric M. Goldin, CHP Southern California Edison <[email protected]> ----------------------------------- Powernet - a service of the Health Physics Society Power Reactor Section Powernet archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Reply to: [email protected] If Questions, contact Mike Russell, CHP at [email protected] --- NOTICE --- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain confidential, privileged or proprietary information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original and any copy or printout. Unintended recipients are prohibited from making any other use of this e-mail. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this e-mail, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments, or for any delay or errors or omissions in the contents which result from e-mail transmission.
