Interestingly, we had a small issue that became a large one due to the
influence of the DOE..  We had a very small alara limit for neutrons around
a bunch of UF6 cylinders.  The dosimeters we used had Li-6 so they were very
responsive to thermal neutrons but the calibration said that the spectrum
was all fast.  I suspected that the neutrons were being moderated by
skyshine causing there to be an excess of thermals that make the dose look
higher than before.  I don't know if you will have that many neutrons as
this was a few acres of cyclinders..  Just a thought.  I wanted to do an
experiment with some dosimeters just to see what we would find, but never
got around to it.


Good luck,


Rob

 

Robert J. Gunter, MSc, CHP

CHP Consultants/CHP Dosimetry

www.chpconsultants.com

www.chpdosimetry.com

Toll Free: (888) 766-4833

Fax:  (866) 491-9913 

Cel:  (865) 387-0028

[email protected]

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
BREHM, DAVID M
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 7:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Powernet: RE: ISFSI/Dry Storage Neutron Spectrum

 

I too am very interested in this.  We did not do a neutron energy study last
dry-cask campaign and, in retrospect, I really wish we had.  We will be
doing a study as part of the next campaign, but any data out there (we use
the DMC-2000GN and OSLN) to get us closer to the mark will help a lot.

 

One learning to share, the cask configuration changed from the first
campaign (where a study was performed) to the second & most recent campaign.
Among other things, the changed cask configuration improved the gamma
shielding, but also had the effect of lowering the average neutron energy
without really changing the neutron flux.  The end result is that field
neutron monitoring -- electronic dosimeter & portable instruments and record
dosimeter -- were quite a bit different.

 

David Brehm

Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station

Supervisor - Radiological Equipment & Dosimetry

Office: 402.533.7582

Cellular: 402.214.0107

Pager: 402.561.3310

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Holmes, Stephen J
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 2:49 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Powernet: ISFSI/Dry Storage Neutron Spectrum

 

Who out there has performed a neutron energy spectrum study specific to dry
storage processes? We have good data on our containment spectrum, but have
not yet done a specific study for dry storage. We are looking at ensuring
our dosimetry/instruments are set up to respond properly to the dry storage
neutron energies. 

 

The only plant I know of that has done this is Kewaunee. If anyone else has,
I would appreciate any learnings you can share. If you haven't, and you have
a good justification for not doing it, I am interested in that as well.

 

Thanks,

-Steve 

 

Stephen J Holmes

Sr. Plant Health Physicist

RE Ginna NPP

Constellation Energy Nuclear Group 

[email protected]

585-771-3577; 585-545-1661 (cell)

 

>>> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal,
professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for
the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the
information in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the
sender. CEG-IP1

  _____  

This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and
proprietary information and is for use only by the intended recipient.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer,
amendment, or acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

Reply via email to