At hope creek we would have our station alara committee review and make recommendations to change the gaol. Then vp and cno would make final decsion as to whether to maintain goal and track expanded scope seperately and track rest of outage to origonal goal. This actually works very well though is more admin to track two goals but prevents other groups from slacking on dose controls Hal trimble-------------------------- Sent using BlackBerry
________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Thu Feb 23 03:04:30 2012 Subject: Powernet: Quick Question (Outage Dose Goal Revision?) At SONGS, the outage dose goal is set prior to the outage like all sites. At the onset of the outage, we had higher than expected dose rates (crud burst with new generators) and revised our outage dose goal accordingly. Would your site have revised the outage goal is similar event occurred? In addition, during the outage it has been determined that additional emergent work will be required to support increased inspections on our steam generators which is dose impacting. Would your site revise your outage dose goal a second time based upon the increased emergent work expected? Or would your site maintain your revised dose goal as is and track the emergent dose as separate goal? Thanks, "Stevie Ray" Vaughan [email protected] ----------------------------------- Powernet - a service of the Health Physics Society Power Reactor Section Powernet archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Reply to: [email protected] If Questions, contact Mike Russell, CHP at [email protected] ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or a person designated as responsible for delivering such messages to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message, in whole or in part, without written authorization from PSEG. This e-mail may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. This notice is included in all e-mail messages leaving PSEG. Thank you for your cooperation.
