Also consider ED angular dependency. The EDs we use (DMC-2000s) are known to 
under-respond by about 20% if the source is from an angle greater than about 75 
degrees from the front face.


1.       Have you ever seen higher TLD results for a majority of workers on any 
particular job(s)?  If so, which one(s)?

In our most recent outage, the workers we used EDEX/mulitbadging dosimetry for 
tended to have higher dose recorded on the DLRs than the EDs estimates



2.       Have you ever required that the TLD and ED be kept together (for 
example in a bag) for a particular job to eliminate placement differences?

When we do EDEX/multibadging we attach the ED to the DLR and put them in a bag

-Steve

Stephen J Holmes, CHP, PE
Sr. Plant Health Physicist, CENG-RE Ginna NPP
[email protected]
585-771-3577

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Bullard, William (Bill)
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 12:27 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: Powernet: Higher TLD Dose Trend.

STP had a similar issue with first PZR nozzle weld overlays. -As I recall we 
concluded a hardened photon spectra from the large amount of shielding we used 
or some small ED/TLD placement differences. On 2nd unit for same job we 
required a special ED/TLD holder on a lanyard that ensured the two devices were 
close together. My recollection is that change dialed it in to our normal bias.


From: Haynes, Larry E [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 10:23 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Haynes, Larry E <[email protected]>
Subject: Powernet: Higher TLD Dose Trend.


Duke saw this issue as well on the same mod at McGuire. I don’t think we can 
say with 100% certainty that we nailed the cause, but after testing with TLD/ED 
pairs we came to the conclusion that the avg. photon energy in the work areas 
had shifted more towards Co-60 due to zinc injection. The EDs (DMC-2000) under 
respond in this energy range which resulted in the correlation delta. We 
discovered this after the first outage working on the mod and RWP review showed 
that the correlation issue was related to the craft that had work many hours on 
the sump mod. Subsequent outage work and testing lead us to this conclusion.

Chris Whitener at McGuire would be a good contact. 980-875-4039.

Larry

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Liesl K Germann
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 2:17 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Powernet: Higher TLD Dose Trend.

Hello All,

At Millstone, we recently discovered a trend where a majority of individuals 
working on our ECCS sump strainer cover installation had TLD doses higher than 
the ED estimates (ICES #305595).  A couple follow-up questions:


3.       Have you ever seen higher TLD results for a majority of workers on any 
particular job(s)?  If so, which one(s)?



4.       Have you ever required that the TLD and ED be kept together (for 
example in a bag) for a particular job to eliminate placement differences?


Thanks!
Liesl


Liesl Germann
Health Physicist
Millstone Power Station
Rope Ferry Road
Waterford, CT 06385
860-447-1791 Ext. 6511



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may 
be legally confidential and/or privileged and does not in any case represent a 
firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender 
without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The 
information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and 
access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, 
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this 
information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that 
you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal,
professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for the
addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the information
in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender. -EXCIP

Reply via email to