Corrosion product source term justifies use of the oxide DAC, which isn't always the most conservative.
Radiation Safety is a Cornerstone of Safe Operation Betsy Langille, CHP Senior Program Manager, Nuclear Power Group Governance and Oversight 1101 Market Street, BR 3C-C Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 (423) 751-8659 office (865) 300-8616 cell [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> NOTICE: This electronic message transmission contains information which may be TVA SENSITIVE, TVA RESTRICTED or TVA CONFIDENTIAL. Any misuse or unauthorized disclosure can result in both civil and criminal penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the content of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by email and delete the original message. From: Robinson, Brent [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 3:35 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: [powernet] Technical Basis (paper) for Solubility Class TVA External Message. Please use caution when opening. Does anyone have a technical basis document they would be willing to share justifying the use of solubility class ALI and DAC values in 10CFR20 Appendix B? If NO: 1. What are you using? 2. Are you using the most restrictive value? 3. If no, how did you determine the proper class? 4. Have you been challenged by regulators on this? A private email response may be appropriate!! Thanks!! Brent L. Robinson TECHNICAL RP SUPERINTENDENT Florida Power & Light St. Lucie Plant 6501 S. Ocean Drive Jensen Beach, Florida 34957 (772) 467-7308 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
