Tasked with performing an informal benchmark on workplace air monitoring of spent fuel pool and containment/reactor cavity. Looking for input on what stations are doing regarding air monitoring instrumentation being used, as well as what factors are considered when determining the placement of this instrumentation with specific regards to the spent fuel pool and containment/reactor cavity.
More specifically: What instrumentation do you use for air monitoring of the spent fuel pool and containment/reactor cavity? What factors are taken into account when determining the placement of air monitoring instrumentation? Are airflow pattern studies performed? If Airflow pattern studies are performed what is the instrumentation used (anemometer, smoke tube, etc...) and at what frequency are they performed? What is the methodology your program uses for tritium monitoring? Thanks! Paul G. Tardif Health Physicist Dominion Nuclear Connecticut Millstone Power Station Rte 156, Rope Ferry Road Waterford, CT 06385 Email: [email protected] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may be legally confidential and or privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
