John:

 

By recollection, the San Onofre procedure required traceability to NIST or
"major industrial nations".  We did not keep a report on file for defense. 

 

Roger Schanzenbach, CHP

 

 

From: Martinson, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2017 1:00 PM
To: Lamons, John <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [powernet] RE: The use of equivalent Primary Calibration Standard
for sources

 

Hello John,

 

    Regarding equivalency of calibration standards; NIST, the German PTB and
many other nations standards institutes are signatories to the CIPM Mutual
Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA). This includes radiation standards. You
can go to the CIPM website: https://www.bipm.org/en/cipm-mra/

to see the members and specifics. All participate in extensive
intercomparison programs to verify equivalence. 

   This was brought up years ago when I was in HP at the Kewaunee Nuclear
Power Plant. The NRC accepted our use of standards produced by the German,
French and Czech's.

    Employing them correctly has, at least to me, always seemed to be where
people made their mistakes......

 

Best Regards,

 

Tim 

 

Tim Martinson

Victoreen

A fluke company             

Office: 440-498-2548

Cell: 860-734-6957

E-Mail: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> 



 

 

 

 

From: Lamons, John [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 1:04 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [powernet] The use of equivalent Primary Calibration Standard for
sources

 

Does anyone take credit for equivalent Primary Calibration Standards for
NIST (ie Primary Calibration Standard of the International PTB) when
calibrating sources? If so, do you have an evaluation that was performed
prior to accepting said standard? Thanks

 

John Lamons

Health Physicist

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant

254-239-6944

  _____  

Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to
the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of
this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any
agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding
effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature
that is included in any attachment. 

Reply via email to