Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> wrote:
> > I can even make it more precise. Current plan is to use GNU ld as long as
> > we are cross building. Having system self-hosting implies having native
> > linker
> > ported.
>
> Ok, thanks. While you could probably get by for a while with static
> linking, going to dynamic linking means porting ld.so, and thus a
> considerable part of the lowlevel/platform specific stuff would be done.
> One can probably leverage krtld work here, too.
We need dynamic kernel linking at a very early stage......
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
